<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem(s) with Revision3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/the-problems-with-revision3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/the-problems-with-revision3/</link>
	<description>It's our turn.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: YouMakeMedia &#187; &#8220;Revision3 Gazette&#8221; Now Free for All Users</title>
		<link>http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/the-problems-with-revision3/comment-page-1/#comment-13182</link>
		<dc:creator>YouMakeMedia &#187; &#8220;Revision3 Gazette&#8221; Now Free for All Users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/22/the-problems-with-revision3/#comment-13182</guid>
		<description>[...] now it&#8217;s the Revision3 Gazette being made available to everyone. As I mentioned in my &#8220;Problems with Revision3&#8221; post, I thought it was a bad move to make exclusive content that users couldn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now it&#8217;s the Revision3 Gazette being made available to everyone. As I mentioned in my &#8220;Problems with Revision3&#8221; post, I thought it was a bad move to make exclusive content that users couldn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouMakeMedia &#187; Last Episode Ever of Revision3&#8217;s InDigital Online Today</title>
		<link>http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/the-problems-with-revision3/comment-page-1/#comment-12962</link>
		<dc:creator>YouMakeMedia &#187; Last Episode Ever of Revision3&#8217;s InDigital Online Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/22/the-problems-with-revision3/#comment-12962</guid>
		<description>[...] Far be it from me to question Revision3&#8217;s decisions, but this seems a little like what G4TV did to their TechTV hosts, which has led to a network that&#8217;s more a horrible parody of real content than it is something decent to watch. But I&#8217;ll leave the ranting to others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Far be it from me to question Revision3&#8217;s decisions, but this seems a little like what G4TV did to their TechTV hosts, which has led to a network that&#8217;s more a horrible parody of real content than it is something decent to watch. But I&#8217;ll leave the ranting to others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/the-problems-with-revision3/comment-page-1/#comment-12801</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youmakemedia.com/2007/09/22/the-problems-with-revision3/#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>The response from David Prager on the Digg submission of this article:

&quot;Good relevant complaints. A lot of this is being addressed (published schedules/standards/memberships/etc). We look forward to making Revision3 a more positive and engaging and interactive experience for all.&quot;

Great to know that this is being worked on, as I really think that Rev3 has huge potential and only falls short on the few things I mentioned here. Also good to know that the Rev3 higher-ups are concerned about their community&#039;s opinion of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The response from David Prager on the Digg submission of this article:</p>
<p>&#8220;Good relevant complaints. A lot of this is being addressed (published schedules/standards/memberships/etc). We look forward to making Revision3 a more positive and engaging and interactive experience for all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great to know that this is being worked on, as I really think that Rev3 has huge potential and only falls short on the few things I mentioned here. Also good to know that the Rev3 higher-ups are concerned about their community&#8217;s opinion of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

